Sunday 6 March 2016

Avoiding Internal War To Secure Trump's Nomination: How Feasible? By Felix N. Jarikre

A Republican Primary.
Mitt Romney, 2012 GOP nominee, had finally taken up the gauntlet of stoutly resisting Donald Trump in a savage, lacerating assault on Thursday March 3rd. That’s a prospect that Republican party elders were loath to confront because of their fear of sparking an internal war that would not only weaken the party, but prevent them from winning the general elections come November. Quietly, they nursed the vain hope that the Trump candidacy would be treated as a joke, waiting to fade into oblivion without leaving a sour taste in the mouth. But they underestimated the anger of the citizens, and the distrust and scorn with which they hold politicians of every stripe who go to Washington to entrench themselves, abandoning the promises they made to the people who elected them into power. 

Tapping into the resentment and fears, both real and imagined, of the evangelicals and working-class whites, on many issues, especially trade and illegal immigration, the real estate mogul called The Donald confounded the predictions, dismissive or tentative, of many political pundits and observers as he did not flame out, but went ahead to solidify his front-runner status through his many commanding victories in the Republican primaries conducted so far. Captured in the popular imagination as a hard clever negotiator, first-class wealthy businessman, a self-funded non-politician who cannot be bought and pocketed by any money-bags, when Mr Trump bellows to the adulating crowds that “we will make America great again” , they believe him. So far, they are not prepared to countenance any argument to the contrary, no matter how well reasoned.

With Jeb Bush, derided as “low energy” by Trump himself, humiliated out of the race, showing the ambivalence with which he ran, despite his $100 million war chest; and Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz failing to make any appreciable impact due to their lack of consistency and courage in frontally challenging Donald Trump at the risk of alienating his loyal supporters, the field was clear for Trump to become the driver of the Republican party. 

If there is still any chance remaining to energize the party faithfuls to wrest control of the party from Mr Trump, the party elders needed someone of immense gravity and importance. The unpleasant  task of trying to slam the brakes on Trump’s momentum fell inevitably on Mitt Romney, one-time governor of Massachusetts and 2012 Republican presidential nominee who happened to be the son of George Romney, a governor of Michigan, extensively deep in Republican politics. The attack was unprecedented and unsparing. Speaking at the University of Utah, Mitt Romney said: “Here’s what I know: Donald Trump is a phoney, a fraud. His promises are as worthless as a degree from Trump University. He’s playing members of the American public for suckers: He gets a free ride to the White House, and all we get is a lousy hat.”

Pointing to Trump’s “ bullying, the greed, the showing off, the misogyny, the absurd third-grade theatrics,” Romney said that “dishonesty is Donald Trump’s hallmark.”

Going further, Romney said of Trump: “He has neither the temperament nor the judgement to be president. Mr Trump is directing our anger for less-than-noble purposes.”

The jury is still out if Romney’s desperate plea would dissuade other Republicans from joining forces with Donald Trump. What is clear is that if anybody expected Trump – a blow-hard, pugnacious, take-no-prisoners warrior – to take Romney’s unprecedented assault lying low, they were hugely disappointed. Characteristically, The Donald came back swinging hard, stinging with undisguised derision. Of Romney, he said: “He was begging for my endorsement. I could have said: ‘Mitt, drop to your knees’ he would have dropped to his knees.”

Accused of hypocrisy and disloyalty for attacking a man he asked to endorse him during his presidential race of 2012, Mitt Romney defended himself that he was forced to go on the offensive when Trump hesitated to disavow the white supremacist, David Duke’s endorsement. That he would not like to embrace “a bigot” that Trump has proved himself to be.

We have not seen the end of this escalating fight. Does the Republican establishment have the stomach to endure a long-drawn out war with Trump who has never hidden his resolve to revolt and run on a third-party platform, should there be any undemocratic gang-up to stop his nomination? Are they going to make peace with Donald Trump, and hope that he would show pragmatic and conciliatory leadership in their battle to take occupation of the White House? Listening to Ben Carson after he ended his presidential campaign officially on Friday, it seems likely that avoiding internal war and making peace with Trump is a more tolerable option for some leading Republicans.

Defending Trump, he said that Mitt Romney’s tear-down of Donald Trump would “destroy the unity in the party...People who think Donald Trump would be the worst thing that ever happened, you make a really big mistake by trying to thwart the will of the people.”

Carson pointed out that Trump’s biggest goal includes being “successful. That’s a huge part of him. He would feel terrible if he had a presidency that was not successful. And he’s smart enough to know that he cannot have a successful presidency with some of the things that he’s talking about, so he would appoint people who were very, very good and very, very smart, and he would largely stay out of their way.”

Looking at the vast mine-field of political gerrymandering in the Republican party, Josh Marshall, editor and publisher of Talking Points Memo said: “This #NeverTrump nonsense will never be convincing if the entire Republican party is saying Trump is a danger to country and party and that the GOP faces an historic turning point while they also agree to support Trump if he’s nominated.”

What is very clear however is that Mr Trump has proved himself to be a hard, unflinching and tenacious fighter.  Opportunistic, perhaps, but not lacking in the area of bouncing confidence.  Learning fast as a politician, he has even shown he is willing to reverse or amend his position in order for him to become more acceptable to others who are terrified of his strongly-held views. Concerning the use of torture on terrorism suspects, he had said, “the United States is bound by laws and treaties, and I will not order a military officer to disobey the law. It is clear that as president, I will be bound by laws just like all Americans.” 

Here’s the reality check. No matter our best of intentions, we must eventually come around to the basic doctrine of democracy that Ben Carson harped on: “You make a really big mistake by trying to thwart the will of the people.” 

Whether the American people would eventually vote in as president this fascinating master manipulator and spinner that Daily Kos calls “reckless and remorseless”, a man who tried to hide his German ancestry but kept a book of Hitler’s speeches, My New Order, by his bed – and apparently has stolen a few tricks from Hitler’s playbook on mass psychology and propaganda – no  one can predict. What is certain is that whatever choice the American people makes as the leader of the free world, the rest of the world must learn to make peace with it.




No comments:

Post a Comment